<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Zeromodel on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title><link>https://aibussin.com/tags/zeromodel/</link><description>Recent content in Zeromodel on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:43:53 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/zeromodel/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Signs, Not Directions: Compiling AI Policy into Visual Artifacts</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/zero/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:43:53 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/zero/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;What happens when a system stops asking an AI for the same directions repeatedly, and starts placing signs where decisions need to be made?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;hr&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="zeromodel-in-one-image"&gt;ZeroModel in One Image&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Most AI systems repeatedly invoke a policy: observe the current state, ask a model what to do, execute the answer, and ask again at the next decision.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;ZeroModel explores a different architecture. When a policy is bounded and stable, it can be compiled into a deterministic artifact that the runtime addresses directly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Search–Solve–Prove: building a place for thoughts to develop</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/ssp/</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 01:13:06 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/ssp/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;🌌 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;What if you could &lt;strong&gt;see an AI think&lt;/strong&gt; not just the final answer, but the whole stream of reasoning: every search, every dead end, every moment of insight? We’re building exactly that: a visible, measurable thought process we call &lt;strong&gt;the Jitter&lt;/strong&gt;. This post &lt;strong&gt;the first in a series&lt;/strong&gt; shows how we’re creating the &lt;strong&gt;habitat&lt;/strong&gt; where that digital thought stream can live and grow.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We’ll draw on ideas from:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Space Between Models Has Holes: Mapping the AI Gap</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/gap/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:30:36 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/gap/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;🌌 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;What if the most valuable insights in AI evaluation aren&amp;rsquo;t in model agreements, but in &lt;strong&gt;systematic disagreements&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;This post reveals that the &amp;ldquo;gap&amp;rdquo; between large and small reasoning models contains &lt;strong&gt;structured, measurable intelligence&lt;/strong&gt; about how different architectures reason. We demonstrate how to transform model disagreements from a problem into a solution, using the space between models to make tiny networks behave more like their heavyweight counterparts.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We start by assembling a high-quality corpus (10k–50k conversation turns), score it with a local LLM to create targets, and train both HRM and Tiny models under identical conditions. Then we run fresh documents through both models, collecting not just final scores but rich &lt;strong&gt;auxiliary signals&lt;/strong&gt; (uncertainty, consistency, OOD detection, etc.) and visualize what these signals reveal.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Complete Visual Reasoning Stack: From Conversations to Epistemic Fields</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/visual_reasoning_stack/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 10:30:45 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/visual_reasoning_stack/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;📝 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;We asked a blunt question: &lt;strong&gt;Can we see reasoning?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#10;The answer surprised us: &lt;strong&gt;Yes, and you can click on it.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;This post shows the complete stack that turns AI reasoning from a black box into an &lt;strong&gt;editable canvas&lt;/strong&gt;. Watch as:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Your single insight becomes 10,000 reasoning variations&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Abstract &amp;ldquo;understanding&amp;rdquo; becomes visible epistemic fields&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Manual prompt engineering becomes automated evolution&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Blind trust becomes visual verification&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;This isn’t just code it’s a visual way of interacting with AI, where reasoning becomes something you can see, explore, and refine.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>🔦 Phōs: Visualizing How AI Learns and How to Build It Yourself</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/phos/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:30:36 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/phos/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;“The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.” &lt;em&gt;Henri Bergson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="-we-finally-see-learning"&gt;🔍 We Finally See Learning&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;For decades, we’ve measured artificial intelligence with numbers loss curves, accuracy scores, reward signals.&lt;br&gt;&#10;We’ve plotted progress, tuned hyperparameters, celebrated benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;But we’ve never actually &lt;em&gt;seen&lt;/em&gt; learning happen.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Not really.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Sure, we’ve visualized attention maps or gradient flows but those are snapshots, proxies, not processes.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;What if we could watch understanding emerge not as a number going up, but as a pattern stabilizing across time?&lt;br&gt;&#10;What if reasoning itself left a visible trace?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Case Based Reasoning: Teaching AI to Learn From itself</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/cbr/</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 23:52:29 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/cbr/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;✨ Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Imagine an AI that gets smarter every time it works not by retraining on massive datasets, but by &lt;strong&gt;learning from its own reasoning and reflection&lt;/strong&gt;, just like humans.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Most AI systems are frozen in time. Trained once, deployed forever, they never learn from mistakes or build on successes. Real intelligence human or artificial doesn’t work that way. It learns from experience.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;This is the vision behind &lt;strong&gt;Stephanie&lt;/strong&gt;: a self-improving AI that gets better every time it acts, not by fine-tuning, but by &lt;strong&gt;remembering, reusing, and revising&lt;/strong&gt; its reasoning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ZeroModel: Visual AI you can scrutinize</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/zeromodel/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 22:41:43 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/zeromodel/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;“The medium is the message.”&lt;/em&gt; Marshall McLuhan&lt;br&gt;&#10;&lt;strong&gt;We took him literally.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;What if you could literally watch an AI think not through confusing graphs or logs, but by seeing its reasoning process, frame by frame? Right now, AI decisions are black boxes. When your medical device rejects a treatment, your security system flags a false positive, or your recommendation engine fails catastrophically you get no explanation, just a &amp;rsquo;trust me&amp;rsquo; from a $10M model. ZeroModel changes this forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>