<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Testing on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title><link>https://aibussin.com/tags/testing/</link><description>Recent content in Testing on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/testing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Evidence and Verification</title><link>https://aibussin.com/books/agents-from-first-principles/10-chapter/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 17:31:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/books/agents-from-first-principles/10-chapter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The agent says:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Done.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That is a claim.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;It is not evidence.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Every mechanism in this book so far has made the agent better at deciding what to do, and none of them establishes that the user&amp;rsquo;s goal was achieved. A planner can produce a coherent plan for the wrong problem. A tool can return exit code zero without producing the intended effect. A search can select the highest-scoring branch when every branch is wrong. A memory system can retrieve a perfectly relevant fact that stopped being true in March.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Machine Coding: Building Software with AI</title><link>https://aibussin.com/books/freestyle-cognition/13-chapter/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/books/freestyle-cognition/13-chapter/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;First, solve the problem. Then, write the code.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="summary"&gt;Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Machine coding is no longer just asking an AI to write files for you.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That was the early version. You described an app, the model produced a pile of code, you copied it into a folder, ran it, pasted the errors back, and hoped the loop converged.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That workflow taught us something important: conversation can turn into software. But it also hid the real lesson.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advanced Agents From First Principles 24: How Do You Release Agent Behavior Safely? Add Behavioral Contracts, Compatibility Checks and Promotion Gates</title><link>https://aibussin.com/books/advanced-agents-from-first-principles/24-chapter/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:09:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/books/advanced-agents-from-first-principles/24-chapter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A model change can pass health checks and still break your agent.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A prompt change can preserve output schema and still change which tools the agent chooses.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A router change can improve average cost and silently starve a specialist that is essential for one high-risk workload.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A memory migration can keep every row intact and still change which memories are retrieved.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A verifier upgrade can make every dashboard greener while making the system less trustworthy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Agents From First Principles 09: AI Agent Says It Worked When It Didn’t? Verify the Result Outside the LLM</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/agents-from-first-principles-09/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 17:31:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/agents-from-first-principles-09/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An AI agent says:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Done. The task is complete.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;That sentence is almost worthless.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The agent may have:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;edited the wrong file,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;changed the right file incorrectly,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;skipped part of the request,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;broken another subsystem,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;failed to save its work,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;misread a tool result,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;passed a stale test,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;inspected the wrong environment,&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;or simply decided that its own answer looked convincing.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The central problem is simple:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The system that produced the answer should not be the only system deciding whether the answer is correct.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>