<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Meta-Reasoning on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title><link>https://aibussin.com/tags/meta-reasoning/</link><description>Recent content in Meta-Reasoning on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:31:41 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/meta-reasoning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Compiling Thought: Building a Prompt Compiler for Self-Improving AI</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/compiler/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:31:41 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/compiler/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How to design a pipeline that turns vague goals into smart prompts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;🧪 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Why spend hours engineering prompts when AI can optimize its own instructions. This blog post introduces a novel approach toward creating a self-improving AI by treating prompts as programs. Traditional AI systems often rely on static instructions rigid and limited in adaptability. Here, we present a different perspective: viewing the Large Language Model (LLM) as a &lt;strong&gt;prompt compiler&lt;/strong&gt; capable of dynamically transforming raw instructions into optimized prompts through iterative cycles of decomposition, evaluation, and intelligent reassembly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thoughts of Algorithms</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/thoughts/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:10:59 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/thoughts/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;How a self-evolving AI learns to reflect, score, and rewrite its own reasoning&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;🧪 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;What if an AI could think not just solve problems, but reevaluate its beliefs in the face of new information?&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In this post, we introduce a system that does exactly that. At the core of our pipeline is a lightweight scoring model called MR.Q, responsible for evaluating ideas and choosing the best ones. But when it encounters a new domain, a new goal, or a shift in task format, it doesn’t freeze it adapts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Programming Intelligence: Using Symbolic Rules to Steer and Evolve AI</title><link>https://aibussin.com/post/symbolic/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:57:20 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://aibussin.com/post/symbolic/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="-summary"&gt;🧪 Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;What if AI systems could learn how to improve themselves not just at the level of weights or prompts, but at the level of strategy itself? In this post, we show how to build such a system, powered by symbolic rules and reflection.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The paper &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.18532v1" target="_blank" class="paper-badge"&#10; style="display: inline-block; padding: 6px 10px; background: #f3f4f6; border-left: 4px solid #3b82f6; border-radius: 4px; margin: 4px 0; text-decoration: none; color: #1f2937;"&gt;&#10; &lt;strong&gt;Symbolic Agents&lt;/strong&gt;: Symbolic Learning Enables Self-Evolving Agents&#10;&lt;/a&gt; introduces a framework where &lt;strong&gt;symbolic rules&lt;/strong&gt; guide, evaluate, and evolve agent behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>