<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>ARM on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title>
		<link>https://aibussin.com/tags/arm/</link>
		<description>Recent content in ARM on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 22:22:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/arm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Adaptive Reasoning with ARM: Teaching AI the Right Way to Think</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/arm/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 22:22:46 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/arm/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;summary&#34;&gt;Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Chain-of-thought is powerful, but which chain? Short explanations work for easy tasks, long reflections help on hard ones, and code sometimes beats them both. What if your model could adaptively pick the best strategy, per task, and improve as it learns?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;code&gt;Adaptive Reasoning Model&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;(ARM)&lt;/strong&gt; is a framework for teaching language models how to choose the right reasoning format direct answers, chain-of-thoughts, or code depending on the task. It works by evaluating responses, scoring them based on rarity, conciseness, and difficulty alignment, and then updating model behavior over time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
