<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AI Self-Improvement on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title>
		<link>https://aibussin.com/tags/ai-self-improvement/</link>
		<description>Recent content in AI Self-Improvement on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:17:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/ai-self-improvement/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>🎂 CAKE: Cognitive Amplification Knowledge Engine</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/cake/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:17:19 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/cake/</guid>
				<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We’re not teaching machines to think. We’re teaching ourselves to build thinking systems.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;-from-ai-assistants-to-controlled-cognitive-amplification&#34;&gt;🎨 From AI Assistants to Controlled Cognitive Amplification&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Most people use AI to write faster.&lt;br&gt;&#xA;But the real opportunity isn’t speed.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It’s amplification.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A useful analogy is physical labor. A person can move earth with their hands, but only at a limited scale. A bulldozer does not replace the human it allows them to operate at a completely different level of throughput.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>✨ TINY CRITICS: Lightweight Reasoning Checks for Large AI Systems</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/critic/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/critic/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;-0-tldr&#34;&gt;🥹 &lt;strong&gt;0. TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Large language models write fluent explanations even when they’re wrong.&#xA;Verifying their reasoning usually requires &lt;em&gt;another&lt;/em&gt; LLM slow, expensive, and circular.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We needed something different:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A miniature reasoning critic &amp;lt;50 KB trained on synthetic reasoning mistakes, able to instantly detect broken reasoning in much larger models.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The Tiny Critic:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;trains on GSM8K-style reasoning traces generated by DeepSeek or Mistral&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;uses &lt;strong&gt;FrontierLens&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Visual Policy Maps (VPMs)&lt;/strong&gt; to convert reasoning into &lt;em&gt;canonical numerical features&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;is just a logistic regression with ~30 parameters&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;runs in microseconds&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;plugs into any agent&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;dramatically improves InitAgent, R1-Loops, and research-planning stability&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This post tells the full story how we built it, why it works, and what we learned about the &lt;em&gt;shape of reasoning&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
