<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AI Hallucination on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</title>
		<link>https://aibussin.com/tags/ai-hallucination/</link>
		<description>Recent content in AI Hallucination on AIBussin — AI applications, systems and books</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:49:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://aibussin.com/tags/ai-hallucination/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>The Moment: Intelligence beyond context</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/moment/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:49:56 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/moment/</guid>
				<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Most AI systems answer and move on. The next step is different: preserve the reasoning state, replay it, measure whether it improves, and keep only what survives verification.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;summary&#34;&gt;Summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Most AI workflows still treat intelligence as a single pass.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;You ask a question.&#xA;The model answers.&#xA;Maybe you ask it to try again.&#xA;Maybe you add more context.&#xA;Maybe you save something to memory.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But the basic shape remains the same:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Warranted Search: When AI Must Prove Before It Looks</title>
				<link>https://aibussin.com/post/grep/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:54:26 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://aibussin.com/post/grep/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;TL;DR&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Modern AI systems often retrieve nearby text and generate confident answers, but that is not the same as proof. A citation can be real, the answer can be correct, and the evidence can still fail to support the claim.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This post argues for &lt;strong&gt;warranted search&lt;/strong&gt;: a scoped, claim-driven form of intelligent grep. Instead of asking an AI to rummage through a corpus, we give it a specific claim, a bounded search warrant, and a limited set of safe operations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
